For the most part, I loved every creation presented on the pages of the Fashion weekly planner. Just a few had me thinking they were more for the runway than reality. Or at least, my reality.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab45b/ab45ba0297babb2841ede982944b11bcdb171280" alt="" |
Evening Dress, Richard Tam, 1960-65
The lines of this dress are still modern but I imagine if I'd worn this, I'd have left a trail of pink feathers in my wake. Still there might have been someone elegant enough to wear this.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1387/d13879c90e48663bfbd9d5f5c75cbf6e6d90e3c6" alt="" |
"Flying Saucer" Dress, Issey Miyake, 1994
This dress, the name of which I think could also have been "Chinese Lantern", has me guessing how the wearer would walk or sit. Were the bands stiff or did they give a little? Did it rustle when worn? Perhaps I'm responding regrettably to the fact I could never wear it; alas, too curvy. All that aside, it's totally cool and captured my imagination for sure.
Evening dress, Yves Saint Laurent, 1969-70
Whimsical, yes -- a construction nightmare I imagine -- but I still can't see myself in this one. I do wonder how heavy this was. Do you think the feather neckline itched or tickled? This one, I must confess, I think was more dramatic costume than wearable fashion. I just can't see someone wearing this to a holiday party...
And thus ends my brief survey of Fashion. It was a great planner, inspiring enough that I bought a book called 100 Dresses about iconic and important fashion creations. If you'd like, I can share some of that book with you too.
|
Comments